This article is published in the Tasambo Journal of Language, Literature, and Culture – Volume 1, Issue 1.
RABIU,
Ridwan Akinkunmi
ridwan.rabiu@kwasu.edu.ng & rhidoh91@gmail.com
ONAOPEPO, Ibrahim Bamidele
Department of Mass
Communication, Southwestern University, Nigeria
AKANJI, A. DAUD
Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University
of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State.
ABIOLA, Olutope Lawrence
Department of Mass Communication, Osun State Polytechnic, Iree,
Osun State.
Abstract
This paper discusses the translation style and methods
adopted by Sobi FM 101.9 Ilorin broadcasters to find equivalent versions for
some selected English lexis and structure, translated into the Yoruba language.
The main objective of this paper is to analyze the relevance of translation and
trace the etymological foundation of the lexis and structure which compel radio
broadcasters to use self-lexical coinage and neology. The work was carried out
within the purview of Newmark levels of translation (level of naturalness,
Referential, cohesive level) to trace the content and function of the lexis and
structure. The theory adopted for this work is the knowledge gap theory; the
main thrust of this theory is to bridge the language gap that exists in media
through the use of the native language. Data for this research were gathered
through the elicitation of a recorded news item from Sobi 101.9 FM Ilorin. Our
research findings show that most translations from the source language
(English) to the target language (Yorùbá) by broadcasters are self-invented,
which could either suit the original version in the target language or not. It
was observed that radio broadcasters adopt suitable translation methods to
retain the content of messages broadcast in a bilingual program. We conclude
our work by saying categorically that broad knowledge of the source language
helps the productivity of a translator to transmit the message to the audience
in the language without any vacuum or gap, and that radio broadcasters adopt
any translation method in as much as the audience comprehension of the intended
messages are the same with the target language.
Keywords:
Translation, Lexis and structure,
Indigenous Radio, Lexical function, and Content.
Introduction
Since its introduction over a hundred years ago, radio has
taken the heart of all the fundamental mass media functions including civic
discourse, accountability, and socio-political awareness, and recently becomes
a worthwhile medium in the sustainability of indigenous culture, particularly,
in the colonized countries like Nigeria (Simon, 2017; Salawu, 2006). Radio is a
revolutionary medium of mass communication that has repeatedly reinvented
itself as new media came along. It has continued to serve as a companion medium
that would keep people company at home, at work, and in the car (Hasson, 2005; Oyero, 2011).
This medium of
communication is significantly suitable and can be described as an ideal means
of mass communication in a third-world country like Nigeria. It is
characterized by large coverage, very cheap to own and maintain without
dependency on electricity power supply, and above all, with the indigenous
radio revolution in Nigeria, its messages, have continued to break the barrier
of illiteracy in form of language (Oyero, 2011; Salawu, 2006 & Folarin, 1990).
It has been observed
by scholars that colonization, modernization, and misconception of civilization
birthed from the aggressive interest in the development of the western Europe
intervention and the Marshall Plan of the United States of America to the
developing and underdeveloped part of the world counted as parts of the reasons
for the dominant euro-imperial languages in media even though the majority of
their population cannot comprehend these languages (Simon, 2017; Esekong, 2014). Many media studies have justified that the opium of
communication everywhere around the world is shared commonness between the
sender and the receiver, irrespective of the medium. However, the majority of
the radio stations in Nigeria are licensed not only to use indigenous language
as the main language of broadcasting. Hence, it is a mixture of both English
and the local languages depending on the location and philosophy of the station
(Adedeji,
2015).
Notwithstanding, the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria
(FRCN) apart from the official language, casts news and rollout many Programs in other major Nigerian
languages such as Hausa, Yoruba, and Igbo. Meanwhile, the intended media
objectives may not be realized if the majority of the messages are not packaged
in the right languages. Citing Oyero (2011), considering the number of people
in Africa who cannot communicate in the English language, the need to
communicate with people in indigenous languages is inherent and cannot be
under-emphasized.
A keen interest to bridge the gap of the language barrier
and the desire to sustain native languages make it inherent for the
introduction of indigenous radio stations across the globe, particularly, in a
country with multiple languages and diverse cultural practices like Nigeria (Oyesomi K. O., Onakoya T., Onyenankeya K. & Busari A.,
2020). According to Salawu (2006), the
indigenous radio stations across the country have contributed to the promotion
of a number of Nigerian languages through various message types and programs
(maintain one constant spelling method i.e. either American or British.
American spellings are used in some places in the paper) such as news,
features, interviews, discussion programs, and chit-chats. The situation has
however changed with some radio stations and some languages in Nigeria.
It is observed that though various studies have been carried
out on Nigerian indigenous radio station and their contributions to the
sustainability of local languages and in the areas of audience interest, there appears to be a gap in terms of approaches adopted by
broadcasters and presenters in the use of semantics and translation styles from
the English language to Nigerian indigenous languages. In this work, we aim to
examine and analyze different translation strategies that broadcasters in Sobi
101.9 FM Ilorin usually adopt in their effort to translate English news items
to the Yorùbá language, which is the native language of their domain, bearing
in mind the relationship between language and culture in African society. This
is so because the communication gap has been observed among listeners who have
little knowledge of the broadcaster’s language and culture.
Social and psychological factors play an important role in
this. Fishman (1964) ascribes the statement “who speaks what language, to whom
and when”, to explain media language. Fishman’s observation explores the
relationship between the three elements of translation study, which are the
Source Language Target Language, and the Audience.
Radio and the Use of Indigenous Language in Nigeria
Radio as an electronic media is made up of distinctive
language use which is majorly to educate, inform and entertain the populace
(Aina 2003and Ifedayo 2014). Radio and other media claim to be the
custodian of peoples’ languages and cultures. Radio presenters choose standard
language, and literary inclined language as their preferred media language, to
achieve their set objectives (Oyesomi
et al., 2020).
The essence of this communication instrument cannot be ruled
out in any radio program. When a language is not appropriately used, the
listener may not understand the disseminated information and as a result,
failed to be informed or misinform (Oyero, 2011; Salawu, 2006). According to Akanbi and Aladesanmi (2014), language
employed in the media goes a long way in determining the audience strength and
effectiveness of its service. When a language is appropriately used, the beauty
of its content will be projected and it will definitely be accepted by the
intended audience.
Radio being the most used traditional media platform in
Nigeria gives birth to this work since ineffective translation style and
methods will deprive a larger part of the Yorùbá population that only
communicates in Yorùbá language as championed by Lawal (2015) who asserts
that “we know that 80 percent of our people who do not speak English carry on
the business of life and living on their farms and in the markets in their
mother-tongue”. The ultimate goal of a language is communication. Studies
have shown that listeners obtain better meaning and greater understanding from
radio messages packaged in the indigenous language. Besides, they derive good
feelings of enjoyment and a sense of satisfaction with radio programs when
packaged in their tongue, as such, prefer radio programs
in their Indigenous language to English language (Oyero, 2003 in Oyero, 2010). Our effort in this work is to examine and analyze
translation strategies that are used by broadcasters to disseminate information
to this audience that form the larger percentage of our society.
Review of Newmark’s Translation Styles
Various definitions have established the act of translation
as a profession and a course of study, which centered on duplicating
information said in one language into another language. The translation is
primarily defined as the rendering of information presented in a text of an SL
into TL, without any violation of the linguistics norms (source).
Newmark (1988) explains translation as rendering the meaning
of a text into another language in the way the author had intended. He explains
that we cannot understand translation without explaining the attribute a
translator needs to possess. One of the attributes
is being a bilingual or perhaps a polyglot that can be endorsed as an authority
in the two languages because of his translation style or methods.
Translation theory is the method of translation used for a
certain type of text and it depends on the functional theory of language. The
nature of a text in the SL determines the approach that a translator adopted in
his or her translation. A text whose attention is basically on the function
adopts a translation theory that is distinct from a content-based text or
language.
Newmark (1988) explains different methods of translation.
They include; word-for-word translation; literary translation; faithful
translation: and a translation that reproduces the contextual meaning of the SL
within the context of the TL structure. Others are Semantic translation: a
translation that further caters to the aesthetic value such as the beauty and
natural sound of the SL. Also, we have adaption: a translation used in
translating all forms of plays. Other methods of translation include free
translation, communicative translation, etc.
According to Newmark (1988), there are four levels of
translation that a translator needs to compare, contrast and distinguish before
arriving at the TL equivalence. They include; Source language level,
Referential level, Cohesive level, and level of Naturalness. In this work,
these four levels of translation will form the foundation upon which our
analysis of Sobi 101.9 FM Ilorin broadcasters’ translation style and methods
will be built on.
Translating: Content and Function
Translation stretches across all forms of communication,
starting from sound, to text and discourse. Determining the equivalence in
translation in lexes is from the semantic representation of either the content
of the text or its grammatical functions. The translation seems to focus more
on content, which can be easily accounted for since its goal is to re-interpret
information (i.e. the context and pragmatic meaning) between two languages. But
function exposes the behavior and relationship of the grammatical element in a
discourse, which does not necessarily validate a good translation.
Kristin & Anne (2013), define content as a language
element in which the meaning can be justified in a dictionary, while Function
according to them, is a language element that exposes the uses of the language
content. Their definition shows a viable interjection that only depends on one
another before a constructive message can be passed with the use of any
language.
Translating a functional word goes a long way because it
relates more to a structure than a word. It is always a difficult task for a
translator to access such linguistic structure to analyze the lexis while
translating. The reason is that languages are different universally. Therefore,
one needs to be critical, patient, and suspicious in order not to
miss-interchange the lexis during an attempt to get the equivalence in
translation. These two aspects of language will be examined in our analysis
Theoretical Framework: Knowledge Gap
Theory
The knowledge gap theory was propounded in (1970) by
Tichenor, Donohue, and Olien. The theory emphasizes the inequality in
information acquisition between the privileged and ordinary members of society
(Aina 2003, Gaziano, 2009). Citing Gaziano (2016), the theory systematically
investigated the gap in knowledge and information acquisition with regard to
mass media information with their knowledge gap hypothesis. He opines that “as
the infusion of mass media information into a social system increases,
specifically, in many colonized countries, segments of the population with
higher socioeconomic status tend to acquire mass media information at a faster
rate than the lower‐status
segments.
This is because the colonization of some countries has
subdued many of the colonized countries to the tongue of their colonizers. This
eventually dashed the earlier hopes raise by mass communication power to cover
large and heterogeneous audiences irrespective of boundary, race, class,
status, language, gender, etc. However, the gap in knowledge between these
segments tends to increase rather than decrease.
The authors contend that the less advantaged would gain
knowledge but that the more advantaged would gain more knowledge faster. The
theory established that the media and other media presenters have a
responsibility as well as freedom in their information-gathering and
dissemination tasks. In other words, the theory is relevant to this work
because it avails the indigenous media presenters the freedom to disseminate
news content in the native language in such a way that can facilitate rapt
understanding of the original content and bridge the knowledge gap that exists
between the literate and the non-literate in the English language.
Research
Methodology
The
study made use of Content analysis. It helps
to understand the impact of certain changes in existing standard procedures. It
focuses on a radio station with indigenous coverage and the focus is on the broadcasters’
translation method and style. This radio station has in stock a lot of programs
designed for indigenous interests. The researchers selected 65 editions of the
“Óńgbóná fẹlifẹli” daily newspaper review in Yorùbá language on Sobi
101.9 FM, drawn from 3rd of June to 30th August from Monday to Friday within
three months. A program that comes on air between 6:30 am to 7:00 am for headline review, and 8:00 am to 10:00 am for news
details. This radio station was selected via the purposive sampling technique. What inferred the choice of the radio station was that Sobi
101.9 FM is the most preferred indigenous radio station in the Ilorin
metropolis. Meanwhile, the selection of “Óńgbóná fẹlifẹli” daily newspaper review was due to the need to translate
from the English language to the Yoruba language which is the lingua franca of
the people of Ilorin.
Data Analysis and Interpretation
In this section, data presentation and analysis of
translated news items in Yoruba from the English language will be examined
using Newmark’s four levels which are; Source language level, Referential
level, Cohesive level, and level of Naturalness. Our analyses will involve
dividing the translated texts in Yoruba into contextual and functional aspects
of the translations.
Table
1a: Contextual Aspect of the Lexes
Referential
Level
|
SL |
Lexical Derivation |
TL |
i. |
Electricity |
Mọ-iná-mọ-iná (Shine shine) |
Mọ̀nàmóná |
ii. |
Motorcycle |
A-lù-pù-pù (Something that sound pupu) |
Alùpùpù |
iii. |
Aso rock |
Àpáta-Ásò (The seat of power in Nigeria. The
rock named Aso) |
Àpáta ásò |
There is a perfect referential denotation between the SL and
TL. Mọ̀nàmọ́ná could be an object
that reflects light in such a way as to brighten the environment, while electricity also has the same feature. Aso Rock translated as Àpáta Ásò has the same meaning which is the seat of government or
presidential villa, but a different reference. Àpáta
Ásò is “Rock Aso”
directly translated from Aso rock.
Also, there is a difference between the referential denotation of Motorcycle and Alùpùpù. The reference to Motorcycle
is embedded in the appearance, while
it is embedded in the act for Alùpùpù.
(The target language employs the use of onomatopoeia i.e., the way the
machine sounds in deriving its name).Level
of Naturalness
|
SL |
Lexical Derivation |
TL |
iv. |
Waste management |
Kó-ilẹ̀-kó-ìdọ́tí (Waste packer)
|
Kólèkódọ̀tí |
v. |
Interim |
Fi-ìdí-hẹ́ (Sit inconveniently /temporary) |
Fìdíhẹẹ́ |
The TL forms have a perfect level of naturalness with the SL
and they both have the same contextual meaning. “Kólèkódọ̀tí” is what TL native speakers will see as waste management because it conforms to
the grammatical structure of their language. The same thing applies to “Interim” translated as “Fìdíhẹẹ́” which indicates partial or something not fully given. The translated forms capture all
possible levels of translation and will propel smooth communication for the TL
listeners or audience.
Table
1b: Functional Aspect of the Lexes
Referential
Level
|
SL |
Lexical Derivation |
TL |
i. |
Electricity |
Mo-ina-mo-ina (Shine shine)
|
Mọ̀nàmọ́na |
ii. |
Motorcycle |
A-lù-pù-pù (Something that sounds pùpù) |
Alùpùpù |
iii. |
Aso rock |
Àpáta-ásò (The rock named Aso) |
Aso rock |
The reference or object is expected to influence the
function of the lexis. The SL Motorcycle may
not properly function as a noun, because the reference is describing an act,
just like the TL Alùpùpù that
describes the act. The same thing applies to Aso rock translated to Àpáta
Ásò, but different in Electricity
and Mọ̀nàmọ́ná. Electricity possesses the same reference
as Mọ̀nạ̀móná, and does not
affect their grammatical function not to remain as a noun.
Level
of Naturalness
|
SL |
Lexical Derivation |
TL |
iv. |
Waste management |
Kó-ilẹ̀-kó-ìdọ̀tí (waste
packer) |
Kólèkódọ̀tí |
v. |
Interim |
Fi-ìdí-hẹẹ́ (Sit inconveniently /temporary) |
Fìdíhẹẹ |
Here, the level of naturalness concentrates on the
naturality of the lexical function of the TL concerning its SL counterpart. In
the translation above, Kòlẹ́kódọ̀tí/
Fìdíhẹẹ́ respectively expressed the naturality of the TL, but the
lexical function of Kólẹ̀kódọ̀tí
differs. Waste management could either be a noun phrase or a noun, while the TL
is a derivative noun. Also, TL's contextual meaning is not sufficient to
capture the context of waste management.
Interim has the same lexical function
(noun) as Fìdíhẹẹ́.
Table 2a: Contextual Aspect of the Structures
Referential
Level
|
SL |
Structural
Derivation |
TL |
i. |
Comedian |
Ò-dá-ẹ̀rín-pa-òṣónú (Someone that brings a smile to an
unhappy person) |
Òdẹ́rìn ín p’òṣónú |
ii. |
Writer |
Oní-gègé-àrà (Someone with a
special pen) |
Oní gègé àrà |
iii. |
Commencement |
Na-ìyẹ́-bìbà (Spread wings openly) |
Na ìyẹ́ bìbà |
The TL forms are long and complete structures derived to
illustrate and describe the contextual meaning of the SL form which happens to
be lexis and phrase. At the referential level, the object jest, laugh for comedy, write or pen for News writer, are common to both SL and
TL, but Na ìyẹ́ bìbà and commencement may not be the same because
the first may refer to a bird or thing that fly, while the latter
strictly means to start.
Cohesive
Level
|
SL |
Structural Derivation |
TL |
iv |
Helicopter |
Bàaĺù-a-bà-sí-ibi-tó-wùú (Flight that land anywhere) |
Bàálù a bà síbi ó wùú |
v |
Ambulance |
Ọkọ̀-gbé-òkú-gbé-oní-àárẹ̀ (Vehicle that carry the sick people) |
Ọkọ̀ gbókùú gbáláàrẹ́
|
vi |
House of representatives |
Ilé-ìgbìmọ̀-a-ṣe-ojú-ṣe-òfin (House containing those that
represent and make laws). |
Ilé ìgbìmọ̀ asojúṣòfin |
Due to the lexical appearance of SL Helicopter and Ambulance,
the translated version TL did not relate at the structural level, because they
occur without SL influence. Only the House
of representative influences the formation of Ilé ìgbìmọ̀ asojúṣòfin. However, they all possess a
description of the meaning in the SL, as their context. The cohesion of the TL Ọkọ̀ gbókùú gbáláàrẹ is gbé, while Ile ìgbìmọ̀ asojúṣòfin is a
and ṣe
Level
of Naturalness
|
SL |
Structural Derivation |
TL |
vii |
Team captain |
Balógun-ẹgbẹ́-a-gbá-bọ́ọ̀lù (war leader of a football team) |
Balógun ẹgbẹ́ agbábọ́ọ̀lù |
viii |
Cashless policy |
Ìlànà-níní-owó-láì-fi-ojú-rí (Ways of owing money without seeing
it) |
Ìlànà níní owó láì fi ojú
rí
|
ix |
Sandwich student |
Akẹ́kọ̀ọ́-ìgbà-yìí-láàárọ́ (Student of the late hours) |
Akẹ́kọ̀ọ́ ìgbàyí láàárọ̀ |
The formation of TL is a complete structure contrary to the
SL which is a phrase. This is because at the TL level there is the usage of the
verb “ni” which denotes a state of being unlike the SL version that lacks any
action word. All the translated forms properly describe the contextual effect
in the SL and this will enable readers or listeners to easily comprehend them.
The TL “akẹ́kọ̀ọ́-ìgbà-yìí-láàárọ́” sound
as if the student regrets attending school early, instead of showing
denotation of evening student as
portrayed by the SL.
Table 2b: Functional Aspect of the Structures
Referential
Level
|
SL |
Structural Derivation |
TL |
i |
Comedian |
Ò-dá-ẹ̀rín-pa-òṣónú (Someone that brings a smile to an unhappy
person) |
Ò-d’ẹ̀rín-pòṣónú |
ii |
News writer |
Oní-gègé-àrà (Someone with a special pen) |
Oní gègé àrà |
iii |
Commencement |
Na-ìyẹ́-bìbà (Spread wings openly) |
Na ìyẹ́ bìbà |
The reference of the translated version at the structural
level is not the same, because SL comedian
and commencement are lexes that
connote isolated meanings. TL structures can absorb possible objects as a
reference. e.g., òdẹ́rín-ín
pòṣónú could be referenced as the verb phrase break laugh, make laugh, cook
laugh, but the comedian is mainly
referenced as a verb laugh. The same
thing occurs with commencement and Na ìyẹ́ bìbà. Reference nouns such
as the noun news and verb write are for News writer, while the noun pen
and verb write are for Oní gègé àrà.
Cohesive
Level
|
SL |
Structural Derivation |
TL |
iv |
Helicopter |
Bàálù-a-bà-sí-ibi-tó-wùú (Flight that land anywhere) |
Bàálù a bà síbi ó wùú
|
v |
Ambulance |
Ọkọ̀-gbé-òkú-gbé-oní-àárẹ̀ (Vehicle that carries sick people) |
Ọkọ̀ gbókùú gbálàárẹ̀ |
vi |
House of Representatives |
Ilé-ìgbìmọ̀-a-ṣe-ojú-ṣe-òfin (House containing those that
represent and make laws) |
Ilé ìgbìmọ̀ aṣojúsòfin |
Among the distinctiveness of the TL, forms are the
structural appearance that is made up of cohesion. The cohesion helps in proper
description and explanation of the contextual meaning of the SL a and o respectively, in TL “Bàálù
a bà síbi ó wùú” are cohesive ties for Bàálù and wùú. The cohesive tie for TL “Ọkọ̀ gbókùú gbálàárẹ̀” is gbé anaphoric to Ọkọ̀,
while Ilé ìgbìmọ̀ aṣojúṣòfin
is a and ṣe, anaphoric to Ilé
igbímọ̀
Level
of Naturalness
|
SL |
Structural Derivation |
TL |
vii |
Team captain |
Balógun-ẹgbẹ́-a-gbá-bọ́ọ̀lù (warrior leader of a football team) |
Balógun ẹgbẹ́ agbábọ́ọ̀lù |
viii |
Cashless policy |
Ìlànà-níní-owó-láì-fi-ojú-rí (Ways of owing money without seeing
it) |
Ìlànà níní owó láì fojú rí |
ix |
Sandwich student |
Akẹ́kọ̀ọ́-ìgbà-yìí-làárọ̀ (Student of the late hours) |
Akẹ́kọ̀ọ́ ìgbàyí làárọ̀
|
The functionality of the TL structure is perfectly
determined by the level of naturalness. All the grammatical class of cohesive
tie conforms to TL structure. Also, the chosen lexes used in the structure
unveil the language intuition of TL native speakers, listeners, and readers.
Result
Analysis
This section shows the translation methods and styles used
by the broadcasters. To know the level of denotation on each translation, the
tables are content/function lexes and content/function structure. CL, TM, CF,
RL, and LON respectively mean content lexis, translation methods, content
function, referential level, and level of naturalness. The Roman numeral ‘i’ to
‘ix’ indicates the position of each data analyzed above.
TL:
Content and Function aspect of the Lexes
|
CL/ CF |
Trans. Style |
Function
Effect |
TM |
Denotation Meaning |
RL |
i. |
Description |
Noun |
Semantic |
Form of energy |
ii. |
Description |
Noun |
Semantic |
Two-wheeled
vehicle |
|
iii. |
Imitation |
Noun |
word for word |
Nigeria govt.
house |
|
LON |
iv. |
Explanatory |
Noun |
Communicative |
Control unused
material |
v. |
Description |
Verb |
Communicative |
temporary period |
The above table shows the way TL is presented, in
conformation to its tradition. It unveils the grammatical categories for each
translated version, by highlighting the meaning which the method of translation
used could result.
At the referential
level, the translation style that is used for the lexis whose function as a
noun describes and imitates the original function of the translated object. The
translator derives his intention from the object performance in the real world
as represented in the denotation meaning. Mọ̀nàmọ́ná,
Alùpùpù respectively describe shine, and motorcycle’s sound which is the way they work, while Àpáta Ásò imitate
Aso Rock lexical pattern and describe
the look of the object.
For the level of naturalness, the translation style for both
lexes is explanatory and descriptive in nature. Kólẹ̀kódọ̀tí directly explains the subject of Waste Management, and Fìdíhẹẹ́ also describes the interim. Aside been a noun and verb,
both translated versions are communicative because they can easily be broken into
words to form a complete grammatical sentence. i.e. Fi ìdí hẹẹ́, kó ilẹ̀
kó ìdọ̀tí.
TL:
Content and Function aspect of the structure
|
CS/ FS |
Tran. Style |
Function effect |
TM |
Denotation Meaning |
RL |
i. |
Description |
Noun |
Semantic/ communicative |
To make comedy |
ii. |
Description |
Noun |
Communicative |
To write |
|
iii |
Description |
Verb |
Communicative |
To commence |
|
CL |
iv |
Explanatory |
Noun |
Semantic |
Aircraft |
v. |
Description |
Noun |
Communicative |
vehicle caring
sick and corpse |
|
vi |
Description |
Noun |
Communicative/faithful |
house to make
law and order |
|
LON |
vii |
Description |
Noun |
Faithful |
leader of a
football team |
viii |
Description |
Noun |
Communicative |
spending
invisible money |
|
ix |
Description |
Noun |
Communicative |
evening student |
The above table shows the translation style, methods, and
functional effect of TL. The information explains the denotation meaning,
method of translation, and grammatical function which is determined by the
subject of the structure. The translation style used at the referential level
describes the function of the translated object as given in the structural
derivation. Ò dẹ́rìn-ín pòsónú,
Oní gègé àrà, and Na ìyẹ́ bìbà tell us what a comedian, writer and to commence do in actual sense. Also,
the translation style, the cohesion and the level of naturalness are
descriptions and explanations of the SL. The major significance here is that
the grammatical functions for all the structures are nouns and the translations
are majorly communicative. That is, they naturally fit into the SL intended
meaning, unlike those that are semantic, and faithful that also fit but do not
naturally fit into the SL intended meaning.
Conclusion
and Recommendations
In this work, we have established that translation as an
instrument used in duplicating messages from one language into another language
mostly occurs with neologisms of all kinds for lexes and structures. We also
discovered that equivalent translation is not always guaranteed, most especially
when translating from English to Yorùbá. The reason which is clearly stated
in our data analysis unveils that Yorùbá TL version did not properly project
the SL form because of the difference between both languages' traditions.
Hence, radio broadcasters use their intuition to retain and blend the
information in the TL, when translating.
Also, it was shown that not all translation methods used by
radio broadcasters are communicative. Many of them are semantic, literary,
faithful, and word-for-word translations. The methods they adopt usually depend
on their level of exposure to the SL and the TL. This paper encourages radio
presenters to rely more on the tradition of TL when translating, rather than
capitalizing on the act of the words and structures of SL. By so doing, TL will
become revitalized and all extinct words that depict exact cultural traits of
the TL will be accessible to old and most especially young speakers of Yorùbá
language.
References
Abiodun Salawu
(2006). Indigenous Language Media: A Veritable Tool for African Language Learning,
Journal of Multicultural Discourses. 1:1, 86-95, DOI: 10.1080/10382040608668533
Adedeji A. O., (2015). Analysis of Use of English and Indigenous
Languages by the Press in Selected African Countries. Arabian Journal of Business and
Management Review (OMAN
Chapter) Vol. 4, No.8; March. 2015
Akanbi A. & Aladesanmi A. (2014). The Use of Indigenous
Language in Radio Broadcasting: A Platform for Language Engineering. Open Journal of modern Linguistics,
published in SciRes. http://www.csrip.org/journal/ojml
Baker, M. (1992). In
Other Words: A Course Book on Translation. London: Sage Publication.
Bamgbose, A. (1986). Yoruba:
A Language in Transition. Lagos. J.F. Odunjo Memorial Lecture Series No. 1
Gaziano C. and Gaziano E. (2009). An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research
(pp.122-136) 2nd Edition. London: Taylor & Francis.
Grabe, M. E., Kamhawi, R., and Yegiyan, N. (2009). Informing
citizens: How people with the Different levels of Education Process Television,
Newspaper, and Web News. Journal of Broadcasting
& Electronic Media, 53, 90– 111. doi:10.1080/08838150802643860.
Ifedayo D. (2014). Community Media and Rural Journalism
in Africa. Akure: Adulawo Publisher.
Joyce, M. (1995). Oxford
Mini Reference Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koller, W. (1995). The
Concept of Equivalence and the Object of Translation Studies. Target, Vol.7
No .2 pp191-122.
Kristin D. & Anne L. (2013). Linguistics for Everyone. U.S.A: Wradworth Cengage Learning.
Munday, J. (2001). Introducing
Translation Studies. London: New York: Rutledge.
Newmark P. (1988). A
Textbook of Translation. U.S.A.: Prentice Hall international.
Nida, E. (1964). Towards
a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill Julian Publisher.
Oyero, O. S. (2011).
Development Content in Indigenous Language Radio. Babcock
Journal of Mass
Communication. Vol 2 No 2, pp. 45-54. Published by Department of Mass
Communication, Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo Nigeria.
Oyesomi K. O., Onakoya T., Onyenankeya K. & Busari A.
(2020). Indigenous Language Media, Communication, and Sickle Cell Disorder:
Peculiarities of Indigenous Language Media
in Tackling Misconceptions of Sickle Cell Disorder. Published in the United States of America. IGI Global
Simon E., (2017). Radio Programs in Indigenous Languages and Rural
Development in South-Eastern Nigeria. World Applied Sciences Journal 35 (5):
822-835, 2017. ISSN 1818-4952© IDOSI Publications, 2017. DOI:
10.5829/idosi.wasj.2017.822.835
No comments:
Post a Comment
ENGLISH: You are warmly invited to share your comments or ask questions regarding this post or related topics of interest. Your feedback serves as evidence of your appreciation for our hard work and ongoing efforts to sustain this extensive and informative blog. We value your input and engagement.
HAUSA: Kuna iya rubuto mana tsokaci ko tambayoyi a ƙasa. Tsokacinku game da abubuwan da muke ɗorawa shi zai tabbatar mana cewa mutane suna amfana da wannan ƙoƙari da muke yi na tattaro muku ɗimbin ilimummuka a wannan kafar intanet.