By
OAMEN Felicia (PhD)
Department of English, Faculty
of Arts
National Open
University of Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8080-2673
Email:
foamen51@gmail.com; 08024552601
Abstract
One of
the major Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations is the
realization of peaceful and inclusive societies by 2030. Given the devastating
effects of domestic violence, this paper provided a pragmatic analysis of
gender representations in media reports. Specifically, the paper analysed the
pragmatics of representations in order to ascertain the framing of actors in
cases of domestic violence in Nigeria. Data were drawn from purposively
selected ten (10) media reports gathered from: The Punch, Daily Trust, The Guardian, The Vanguard, Premium Times and Nigerian
Tribune. The
analysis of this study dwlled on the metaphorical characteristics, speech acts,
implicatures, presupposition and politeness norms deployed in the projection of
Self and Others in the discourses. The objective was among other things to
determine implications of domestic violence against women in Nigeria. The
analysis of the data revealed that Nigeria’s media discourse on domestic
violence represented women as dominated actors. In addition, the reports demonstrated unequal power relations
between male and female genders in Nigeria’s patriarchal society. In light
of the findings, it was recommended that the government demonstrates more
commitment to the realization of gender equality, as this has implications for
the realisation of a peaceful Nigerian society.
Keywords: pragmatics, gender,
media, domestic, violence
Introduction
Cases of domestic violence are on the rise globally.
Factors such as isolation due to COVID-19, loss of jobs, and increasing work
stress, among others have been identified as the causes of the significant rise
in cases of domestic violence. Women as vulnerable members of society have been
particularly affected. According to a United Nations’ report globally, 81,000
women were killed in 2020, and 47,000 of them (58%) died at the hands of their
husbands or family members. In Nigeria, cases of domestic violence and deaths
due to these phenomena have been recorded in the past. According to the
National Demographic and Health Survey (2018), more than a quarter of Nigerian
women have experienced some form of domestic violence or the other. For
instance, in 2017, Olaoluwa Adejo, a bank worker was arrested in 2017 for
beating his wife, Maureen to death (Folarin, 2017). In recent times, reports
indicate that the cases are significantly on the rise. A UN Women Report
provides evidence to show that since the outbreak of COVID-19, 48% of Nigerian
women have been subjected to one form of domestic violence or the other
(Okafor, 2021).
On April 8, 2022, the late gospel singer, Osinachi
Nwachukwu joined the list of Nigerian women who have been allegedly killed by
their husbands. Thus, against the background of the United Nations’ efforts at
attaining peaceful and inclusive societies by 2030, this paper provides a
critical pragmatic analysis of gender representations in some Nigerian media reports.
This is in light of the significance of the media in its capacity to frame the
news and also disseminate information to a wide audience. Specifically, the
paper critically analyses the pragmatics of gender representations with a view
to unveiling the social conditioning of naturalised media discourse of domestic
violence in Nigeria.
Literature
Review and Conceptual Clarifications
i. Domestic
Violence in Nigeria
Perhaps,
because of its implications for citizens’ health and general well-being,
scholarly attention has been paid to the challenge of domestic violence for
many years. Hester (2009) studied perpetrators of domestic violence by tracking
reported cases made to the Northumbria police from 2001-2007. The study
revealed that there was a slight increase in the number of women who
perpetrated domestic violence when compared with past research. Nonetheless,
the greater number of cases examined were perpetrated by men. Other studies
(e.g. Bakare, Asuquo & Agomoh, 2010; Uzuegbunam, 2012; Abayomi, Kolawole
& Olabode, 2013,) investigated women as victims of domestic violence.
Similarly, these studies reflect the idea that a significant number of women in
different parts of Nigeria are victims of domestic violence. In addition, the
studies index the challenge of gender inequality as a major underlying factor
which engenders violence against women in the country.
Other
scholars (e.g. Fawole, Okedare & Reed, 2021; Onyebuchi, Nwagbara, David
& Weluche, 2021) have also studied the direct effect of COVID-19 on peaceful
co-existence of partners in domestic environments. On the one hand, Fawole, et
al. studied media coverage of reports from an organization that responded to
violence against women in the southern parts of Nigeria during the lockdown. On
the other hand, Onyebuchi, et al. carried out a content analysis of news
coverage of domestic violence during the lockdown. Both studies identified
economic downturn engendered by COVID-19 as a major factor that exacerbated
domestic violence in homes during the lockdown.
Some scholars have also studied domestic
violence from a linguistic perspective. For instance, Leong (2011) carried out
a critical discourse analysis of newspaper reports of cases of domestic
violence in Malaysia. The author, who adopted and adapted Van Dijk’s social
cognition framework, noted that the linguistic elements deployed in the reports
ideologically reflected news actors’ covert gender bias in the representation
of male/female perpetrators of domestic violence. In addition, he noted that
the text producers mostly foregrounded the vulnerability of the women and,
thus, represented the female gender as victims in a male dominating society.
Abochol and Adeboye (2015) examined the
semantic implications of media reports of domestic violence in Nigeria. Abochol
and Adeboye employed Halliday’s Scale and Category theory to study semantics of
words and expressions of selected newspaper headlines. The authors noted that
the use of violent words in news headlines had semantic implications as they
engendered fear and worry in citizens.
Aragbuwa
(2021) applied Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive model of critical discourse analysis
to the study of discursive strategies employed in fifteen victims’ weblog
narratives of domestic violence. The findings showed that the victims
ideologically represented themselves as the dominated group, while their
assailants were constructed as the dominant group. In this way, the narratives
functioned as discourses of resistance against inequality. Similar to Aragbuwa
(2021), this paper is also concerned with the critical investigation of media
discourse on domestic violence. However, it applies the critical approach to
the pragmatic analysis of gender representation in media reports of domestic
violence in Nigeria.
ii. Ideology
in Media Framing of Discourse
The
term ideology is described from different perspectives. Indeed, Gerring (1997)
described scholars’ varied views as reflecting the ‘semantic promiscuity’ of
the term. Some of the descriptions proffered by scholars in the field of
discourse analysis include, for example, that of van Dijk (2000), which emphasises the cognitive aspects of ideology.
He describes ideology as social representations or beliefs shared by members of
social groups. Fairclough (1992) and Wodak (2001),
on the other hand, views ideology from the
social constructionist perspective. Thus, Fairclough explains that ideology is
a construction of reality, while Wodak notes that it helps to establish and
maintain unequal power relations. Fairclough further notes that ideology is
more effective when embedded in discursive practices and expressed in the form
of commonsensical discourse.
The
media, in the contemporary world, serves as the channel through which
information is disseminated to a large audience. Some observers have noted by
some observers that the media is significant in shaping perception and
constructing meaning for society. Others however, view the media as playing a
neutral role in disseminating objective and realistic news (Lassen, 2006). One
would, however want to argue that the processing of information by the media is
often mediated by media actors’ ideological and, in some cases, political
stances on issues.
In
addition, it could be argued that ideology could become instrumental in the
re(production) of dominance and unequal power relations, particularly when used
by social actors in framing events in one way or the other. This paper is
therefore focused on the critical pragmatic investigation of underlying
ideologies that constitute media representation of gender in reports of
domestic violence in Nigeria. The investigation of the mediating role of the media on the
representation of gender in issues of domestic violence should aid a better
understanding of unequal power relations in Nigeria.
iii. Critical
Tradition and Pragmatics
The
main interest of pragmatics is in the study of speaker’s intended meaning and
contextual meaning (Yule, 1996). However, Mey (2001), has argued that
pragmatics studies should include a critical look at how power
relations and ideologies in society affect how people use language. Proponents
of the ‘critical’ approach to the study of language use (for example, Wodak,
2000; van Dijk, 2000), posit that social conditioning of discourse is usually
naturalised and taken for granted. Therefore, these conditions are difficult to
detect and it is also difficult to determine their effect. In the same vein,
Mey (2001) notes that the social conditions of language are difficult to unveil
because they are engrained in the foundations of the users’ acquisition of the
language. Fairclough (1995), therefore argued for the usefulness of critical
analysis of language use because this approach could help to unveil the opaque
ideologies which underlie discursive practices. In light of this discussion,
critical pragmatics is also expected to be relevant to the study of veiled
expressions of power abuse, social injustice, discrimination, sexism in media
discourse of domestic violence.
As
mentioned above, the media has the potential to shape opinions and present
particular realities of issues in a pervasive manner (Ameli, et al., 2007). The
ideological operation of media discourse is reflected in the fact that language
is deliberately selected when used to describe situations and events (Kress
& Hodge, 1981). The institutional discourse of the media also puts some
constraints on the framing of news by the actors involved in the event. This
study therefore views institutional media discourse as channels through which
language could be employed to express the ideologies (particularly, ideologies
of patriarchy and sexism) of social actors in domestic violence-related
matters.
Aim and Objectives of the Study
The
paper is tailored towards critically investigation of the social conditioning
of media use of pragmatic features in the representation of gender reports of
domestic violence in Nigeria, which is the principal aim of the study.
Therefore, this perspective on discourse study is considered as emancipatory,
and so it is expected that the study could help bring about positive social
change with regards to female gender rights in Nigeria. Therefore, the specific
objectives of the study are as follows:
a.
Identify pragmatic features employed in
the selected media reports,
b. Critically
discuss the deployment of the pragmatic features in gender representation, and
c.
Relate the texts to the socio-cultural
contexts of their production.
Methodology
The
analysis of data was carried out following Mey’s (2001) perspective on the
critical approach to the pragmatic analysis of texts. The data were drawn from
national newspapers’ reports on domestic violence from 2020 to 2022. The choice
of this period was informed by media reports which indicated that there has
been a significant rise in cases of domestic violence in Nigeria from the
inception of the COVID-19 pandemic in the country till date. 10 selected news
reports were drawn from the websites of 7 (seven) Nigerian print media. The
media include, The Punch, Daily Trust, The Guardian, The
Vanguard, Premium Times, Sahara Reporters and Nigerian Tribune. These
media were selected because they have a national presence and also represent
news coverage from the different regions of south west, south east, south
south, and northern parts of the country. The samples used were delimited to
only those which demonstrated ideological representation of gender in domestic
violence-related cases in Nigeria. The analysis was carried out using the
critical approach to the study of pragmatic features. For ease of analysis, the
samples were labelled as DVR to represent the Domestic Violence Report. Each of
the samples was subsequently labelled 1, 2, 3, etc.
Discussion and
Findings
The
critical pragmatic approach is adopted in analysing of the data for this study.
The focus of the analysis is on the ideological study of pragmatic features in
the representation of gender in newspaper reports of domestic violence in
Nigeria. A qualitative analysis is carried out on a few samples to validate the
findings of the study. One of the pragmatic elements employed in the reports is
reference.
DVR
1
I had a
baby boy before the family came to marry me off. Johnson was the one they
presented to marry me. After the traditional marriage, I went to stay
with them. Then they told me that James was my husband. I
discovered that James is mentally ill, epileptic, and impotent. He does
not talk to me from morning till night. In the night, he would attack me
with a cutlass. He wanted to kill me one night as I was sleeping
and he nearly strangled me. At a time, I spent three years in my
father’s house without any information from his family. So, now, I
want to be free from them. They should come and collect the bride
price they paid to my parents.
(The
Punch, July 1, 2021)
DVR 2
Elizabeth is my sister. It is true that they
told us that he (James) is sick, but the damage is too much. He
is mentally unstable and wanted to kill her. For three years, now they
have never asked about her. I don’t want him to kill my sister one day. I
am appealing to the court to take another step and save my sister’s life.
(The Punch,
July 1, 2021)
In DVR
1 and DVR 2, the use of reference categorises the social actors as
powerful or dominant actors in marital matters in traditional Nigerian society.
The utterances made by Elizabeth and her brother demonstrate this observation
(1). “the family came to marry me off” (2) “they told me
that James was my husband” (3) “I want to be free from them”
(4) “they told us that he (James) is sick” (5) “now they
have never asked about her”. For example, the third person pronoun,
‘they’ represents a marital relationship in the traditional Nigerian context as
a communal affair rather than that between a man and a woman.
In addition, the speech act in the form of
directives is enacted through the utterances: ‘marry me off’, ‘told me’, ‘told
us’, ‘never asked us’, represent the woman and her family as voiceless
participants in marital relationships. In this way, the negative face of the woman
and her family is threatened. In addition, Elizabeth’s brother employs the
speech act of pleading rather than commanding in DVR 2. For instance, he
declares helplessly, “I am appealing to the court to take another step and save
my sister’s life”. Where the female/victim employs the speech act of directing
or commanding, the utterance is not assertive. Rather, it is presented in the
form of a request: “So, now, I want to be free from them. They should come and
collect the bride price they paid to my parents”.
Thus, the illocutionary force employed by the woman
and her brother in the extracts presents them as powerless, dominated, and
voiceless participants who are at the mercy of spousal control. This is
understandable when viewed against the background of the influence of the
extended family on a marital relationship in Nigeria. Although, modernization
has liberated male factors with regards to marital choices, in traditional
Nigerian societies, the extended family still wields a vital influence on the
marital choices of the male children (Aniche, 2017). In addition, some scholars
(e.g., Makama, 2013) have noted that patriarchy affects women by creating a
sense of low self-esteem, making them perceive themselves inferior to the male
counterparts.
DVR 3
In his reaction, James said his wife was amusing,
adding that they had no problems. “She is making me to be amused. We
don’t have any problem. The day she left home, I went for a
burial and she asked me to have sex with her and I said no,
because I was tired. I beat her and she left that day,” he
stated.
(The Punch,
July 1, 2021)
On the contrary, in DVR 3, the
husband/aggressor employs reference in the form of a face-threatening act. He
erases the woman’s identity by using the personal pronoun ‘she’ in his
comments. By avoiding using direct naming such as ‘wife’ or ‘Elizabeth’, the
man tacitly demonstrated a lack of acknowledgment of marital connection with
the woman. The husband’s address style therefore shows disrespects and at the
same time ridicules and belittles the woman’s negative face. In addition, the
male actor’s use of bald on record impoliteness undermines the female gender
power of his wife and signals his assumed masculine control. His utterance: ‘she
asked me to have sex with her and I said no, because I was tired.
I beat her’, demonstrates the hidden presupposition that it is shared
knowledge that a wife does not argue with her husband in the traditional
Nigerian society. This is best understood against the background of scholars’
(e.g. Moughalu & Abrifor, 2020) observation that in traditional patriarchal
Nigerian society, women are not expected to have a voice in public discourse.
This practice it is argued, engrains gender inequality and domination.
Moreover, the material process ‘beat’ also
demonstrates masculine force and domination of the female gender. In addition,
the speech act of asking/begging employed by the woman, portrays unequal power
relations in a marital relationship. The woman is thereby represented as
powerless with regards to her status as a wife. Gender representations in DVR
1 to 3 therefore show an underlying patriarchal influence on
women-men domestic relations. In addition, power relations in the three
extracts reflect Ebukue’s (2017) observation that in Nigeria’s patriarchal
traditional society, women are dominated in issues of power sharing and
resource control.
DVR 4
She did not
die of cancer.
The husband, Mr Peter Nwachukwu hit her
with his leg on the chest. All these while, he had been beating her but my
sister hid all that she was passing through from us. Before now, we told her to come out of the marriage, we told
her that they are not divorcing, that it’s just separation. But she felt that God is against divorce.
(Vanguard, April 10, 2022)
DVR 5
Recounting an encounter with the singer, he said,
“One time in a studio, this man slapped her in the studio just because she
wanted to record the song in Igbo against his will. She does not do
anything on her own.” “She would say, please beg my husband. She was at
his mercy. I didn’t know the intensity of what she was going through; I didn’t
know how somebody would be jealous of their wife or claim to love.
(Premium Times, April
9, 2022)
Unequal power relation in gender relations is also
demonstrated in DVR 4 and DVR 5 where social actors’ use of
reference, implicature and illocutionary force demonstrate male domination of
women in Nigeria’s religious context. The bald on record assertion: ‘She did
not die of cancer’ is foregrounded to
establish the claim that the late Osinachi died from domestic violence at the
hands of her husband, Peter Nwachukwu. In addition, she employed the illocution
force of ‘attacking’ in the utterance: ‘Mr Peter Nwachukwu hit her with
his leg on the chest’ to assert that the female/victim’s death was as a result
of masculine brute force rather than a medical cause. In addition, the mental
process, ‘felt; is used by the narrator in the utterance: ‘But she felt that God is against divorce’ to
indirectly reprimand the victim’s emotional assessment of an abusive marriage
on the basis of spiritual ideology.
The
speech act also critically alludes to the biblical instruction: ‘For the Lord
God of Israel says that He hates divorce (Malachi 2:16). Structured in this
way, the utterance implicates religion as having a disempowering influence on
women in abusive marriage in Nigeria. It should however be noted that some
scholars (e.g. Woodhead, 2013) have argued that religion could reinforce
existing gendered distributions of power. In other words, social actors who
belong to a traditionally patriarchal society may likely manifest inequality in
gender relations as a result of cultural influences rather than Christianity.
This implicates the fact that Nigerian Christian women’s submission to abusive marital
partners may perhaps be the outcome of cultural ideologies of the status of
females in marital situation rather than the influence of Christian religion on
women.
In a
similar vein, in DVR 5, the male actor (Frank Edwards), a third party
in late Osinachi Nwachukwu’s domestic violence case, employed the illocution of
criticizing in challenging female gender domination. His narration: ‘this man
slapped her in the studio just because she wanted to record the song in Igbo
against his will’ reflected the resistance of masculine dominance in a domestic
relationship in Nigeria. His use of the material process: ‘slapped’ projected
the brutal force with which Osinachi’s husband/aggressor physically oppressed
his wife. In addition, Edwards indirectly criticized Osinachi for demonstrating
powerlessness in the face of male domination: ‘She would say, please beg my
husband’. The speaker’s illocutionary force of ‘begging’ reflected his
evaluative attitude which implied that the victim lacked emotional and perhaps physical
power to resist an abusive marital situation.
It is
important to note that Osinachi’s (the
victim) illocution of begging demonstrates female gender’s compliance to male
domination in a traditional context. In other words, the utterance: please beg
my husband’ demonstrates internalized domination. It has been observed that
gender domination could become internalized. In this case, women having been
exposed to male discriminatory behaviours in society, also go on to enact the
behaviour in everyday interactions (Bearman, Korobov & Thorne, 2009).
DVR
6
A 23-year-old mother of two, identified as
Mercy Samuel, has been allegedly killed
by her husband, Samuel Matthew, in Jos the Plateau State capital. Her husband
reportedly ripped open her stomach
and cut the intestines during a
disagreement on Sunday night. After he disemboweled
his wife, Mr. Samuel fled with his wife’s phone so she cannot call for help.
She was discovered and taken to hospital on Monday morning.
(Vanguard, April 20, 2022)
DVR 7
She
explained that her daughter had packed out of her matrimonial house five days
to the incident and was living with her when she decided to return for a party
at the children’s school. She said she never returned alive.
(PUNCH, November 28, 2017)
DVR
8
The State Project Officer, Women’s
Right Advancement and Protection Alternative, WRAPA, Jummai Madaki, who was
trying to get support for the late Mercy before her demise, asked all people of
goodwill to rise and ensure justice for the deceased. “They live in a small
apartment, so I wonder why no one heard her scream. We were told help did not
come until the early hours of Monday, when she was rushed to the hospital and
was placed on oxygen.
(Vanguard,
April 20, 2022)
In DVR 6, the writer sustains journalistic
neutrality and objectivity in a story involving the alleged gruesome murder of
a woman by using of the third person pronoun. Mercy Samuel was allegedly killed
by her husband, Samuel Matthew. The illocution of attacking is enacted through
the use of material processes such as: ‘ripped’, ‘cut’, ‘disemboweled’ which
sustained the idea of the use of brute force in the domination of a woman in
domestic relationship. The disempowering power of the traditional
status of women in marital relationship is also demonstrated in DVR 7. In the extract, the mother of
Mercy Samuel alluded to the fact that the woman could not completely detach
from the oppressive marriage because of her sense of duty to her children.
Thus, it is observed that the illocution of reporting: ‘she decided to return
for a party at the children’s school’, contains the hidden presupposition that
the victim would not have died if she had not been too committed to her
children’s welfare.
In DVR 8, the state project officer for a
gender rights organization indirectly criticized societal neglect of women in
the hands of male aggressors in the country. The utterances: ‘They live in a
small apartment’, ‘so I wonder why no one heard her scream’, ‘surprisingly, the
matter was not reported to the police’, carry
the implicatures of lack of support for vulnerable groups in Nigeria. In
addition, the utterance: ‘We were
told help did not come until the early hours of Monday’ presuppose that the
woman’s life could have been saved if society had been more responsive to
providing medical assistance during an emergency. Therefore, these discursive
moves indirectly implicate the Nigerian environment as a domain where life is
precarious for women due to domestic violence.
In addition, DVR 5 to 8 reflect Van
Dijk’s (1997) observation that the discourse of power does not only express
top-down relations of dominance, but also demonstrate resistance to power
abuse. In DVR 5 to 8, social actors
discursively resisted gender domination in domestic-related violence. However,
it is observed that the social actors who are females (Mercy Samuel’s mother
and the state project officer for a gender rights organization) employed
indirect speech acts in their criticism of the oppressive treatment of the
victims. For example, the fragment: ‘she decided to return for a party
at the children’s school’, indirectly queries assigned female domestic role in
traditional Nigerian society. On
the other hand, the male social actor overtly expressed his anger over the
death of Osinachi, who he believed died from injurifes sustained through
domestic violence. This observation can be seen in the following extracts: ‘She does not do anything on her own. She was
at his mercy’. (DVR 5); ‘she decided to return for a party at the
children’s school’ (DVR 7). We were told help did not come until the
early hours of Monday (DVR 8). These
extracts, therefore show that in cases where citizens expressed resistance to
unequal power relations in domestic violence, the female gender was not as assertive as their male
counterparts.
DVR 9
What
haven’t we weathered together? You witnessed so many in my womb and when you
arrived this world, you were barely four months old when you witnessed your
mother being beaten like a puppy,”
she added. You were in my arms that night at the Wheatbaker Hotel after he was
released from Ikoyi prison; it was all laughter at first, then prayers of
thanksgiving and next, punches.
(SAHARA
REPORTERS, February 1, 2022)
DVR
10
I am
Richard Adejo. I am five years old. My daddy beat my mummy with a belt; machete
her here (shows arms), machete her here (shows legs). He used the belt on her
here (points at face); forced my mummy to drink otapiapia (insecticide). My
daddy took my mummy away.
(PUNCH, November 28,
2017)
In DVR 9 and 10, the
utterances of the narrators are structured in the form of victim discourse. For
instance, a mental model of unequal physical power is activated in DVR 9 through the metaphor: ‘beaten like a puppy’. In DVR 10, material processes such as ‘beat’, machete’ ‘forced’ and
‘took’ are employed in the form of face-threatening acts to create a vivid
image of a man’s use of physical force to dominate the female gender. In DVR 9 also, the reference ‘you’ is
employed to foreground in the mind of the reader, the addressee who is a baby.
This is juxtaposed with the pronoun ‘he’ as a reference for the husband, who is
presented without a name. By addressing her husband as ‘he’ the discourse of
the ‘unsayable’, which reflects an underlying traumatized narrator’s mind, is
enacted. This observation agrees with Rogers’ (2007, cited in Busch &
McNamara, 2020:9) position that sometimes traumatized actors employ
specific words as ‘placeholders for the unsayable’. In DVR 9, the female actor’s chronological enumeration of events: ‘after he was released from Ikoyi prison; it was all laughter at first; then prayers of thanksgiving; and next, punches’,
tacitly
represents the male aggressor as mentally unstable. In DVR 10, the local word: ‘otapiapia’ (which means insecticide) represents the male aggressor in a
domestic violence situation as criminal and murderous.
Conclusion
and Recommendations
This paper investigated a critical pragmatic
analysis of gender representation in Nigeria’s media reports. Ten (10)
purposively selected newspaper reports of domestic violence were analysed. The
findings revealed the use of pragmatic resources of reference, presupposition,
illocutionary force, face-threatening acts, implicature among others in the
representation of asymmetrical relations of genders in domestic
violence-related matters in Nigeria. Generally, the discourse represented women
as powerless social actors in cases involving male aggression in domestic
environments. In instances where male gender dominance was resisted, the female
social actors employed indirect speech acts in their criticism of female gender
subjugation. The male actor, however, employed a more direct and overt
discourse in his criticism of gender dominance. Using the case of Rwanda as an
example of African nations where political leaders are making deliberate
efforts to empower women, the findings show that Nigerian women are still very
much subjugated in domestic affairs. In light of the findings, it is recommended that the federal government
demonstrate a stronger political will in its enforcement of punishments to
erring social actors. In addition, it is recommended that the government work
in partnership with relevant Non-Governmental Organisations to facilitate women
empowerment through grassroots enlightenment programmes. This could be
effectively done through programmes that help to remove the stigma around
domestic violence; encourage feedback from victims and guarantee protection for
the female gender. These actions among others should help to ensure the
realisation of gender equality and the reduction of violence among Nigerian
citizens by 2030.
References
1. Abayomi,
A.A. & Kolawole, T.O. (2013). ‘Domestic Violence and Death: Women as
Endangered Gender in Nigeria’. American
Journal of Sociological Research, 3(3), 53-60.
2. Abochol,
S.I. & Adeboye, O.O. (2015). The Semantic Implications of Media Reports on
3. Violence
in Nigeria”. Journal on English Language
Teaching, 5(1), 35-44.
4. Ameli,
S.R., Marandi, S.M., Ahmed, S., Kara, S & Merali, A. (2007). ‘The British
Media and
5. Muslim
Representation: The Ideology of Demonisation. England’. Islamic Human Rights
Commission.
6.
Aniche, A.
(2017). ‘Dwindling Impact of Kinship/Extended Family System among the Ndi
7.
Igbo of South
Eastern Nigeria’. Online Journal of Arts,
Management and Social Sciences, 2(1), 247-252.
8. Aragbuwa,
A. (2021). ‘Discursive Strategies and Resistance Ideologies in Victims’
9. Narratives
in Stella Dimoko Korkus’ Domestic Violence Diary 1-4: A Critical Discourse
Analysis’. Ghana Journal of Linguistics,
10(1), 251-275.
10. Bakare,
M.O., Asuquo, M.D. & Agomoh, A.O. (2010). ‘Domestic Violence and Nigeria
11. Women –
A Review of the Present State’. Nigerian
Journal of Psychiatry, 8(2), 5-14.
12.
Bearman, S. Neill, K. & Avil, T.
(2009). “The Fabric of Internalised Sexism.” Journal of Integrated Social
Sciences, 1(1), 10-47. Retrieved from www.jiss.org.
13. Busch, B. & McNamara, D. (2020). ‘Language
and Trauma’. Applied Linguistics,
41(3), 323-333.
14.
Fairclough,
N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change,
Cambridge: Polity Press.
15. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language.
London: Longman.
16. Fawole,
O.I., Okedare, O.O. & Reed, E. (2021). ‘Home was not a Safe Haven: Women’s
Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence during the COVID-19 Lockdown in
Nigeria’. BMC Women’s Health, 21(32),
1-7.
17.
Folarin, S.
(2017). ‘Lagos Banker Allegedly Tortures Wife to Death’. The Punch,
18. Gerring,
J. (1997). ‘Ideology: A Definitional Analysis’. Political Research Quarterly. 50(4), 957-994.
19. Hester,
M. (2009). ‘Who Does What to Whom? Gender and Domestic Violence Perpetrators’.
A Report of Research Project Commissioned by the Northern Rock Foundation.
20. Kress,
G. & Hodge, R. (1981). ‘Language and Ideology’. Routledge &Kegan Paul:
London.s
21. Lassen,
I. (2006). ‘De-naturalising ideology: Presupposition and Appraisal in Biotechnology
Press Releases’. In Lassen, Inger, Strunck, Jeanne & Vestergaard Torben, Mediating Ideology in Text and Image,
John Benjamins: Amsterdam, 97-118.
22. Leong,
K.W. (2011). ‘A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on Domestic Violence
in Malaysian Newspaper’. MA Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Languages and
Linguistics, University of Malaya.
23.
Makama, G.A.
(2013). ‘Patriarchy and Gender Inequality in Nigeria: The Way Forward’. European Scientific Journal, 9(17),
115-144.
24. Mey, J.L.
(2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction.
Blackwell Publishing: USA
25.
Moughalu, C.O. & Abrifor, C.A. (2020). ‘Traditional Society in South-Eastern
Nigeria: Implications for Women’s Health’. The
Bangladesh Development Studies, 43(1/2), 127-146.
26.
Nigeria Demographic
and Health Survey (2018). National Population Commission, Anuja.
27.
Okafor, C. (2021).
‘48% of Nigerian Women Experienced Violence since COVID-19 Pandemic – UN
Report’. Premium Times, November, 24,
2021.
28. Onyebuchi,
A., Nwagbara, C., David, U.C. & Weluche, J.E. (2021). ‘Newspaper Coverage
of Domestic Violence during Coronavirus
Lockdown in Imo State, Nigeria’. SAU
Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 6(3), 87-92.
29. Rogers
(2007) Uzuegbunam, A.O. (2012). ‘Women in
Domestic Violence in Nigeria: Gender Perspectives’. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 185-191.
30. Van
Dijk, T.A. 2000. Ideology and Discourse:
A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Retrieved from http://www.discourses.org.
31.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). ‘What is Political Discourse Analysis?’ http://www.discourses.org.
32. Wodak,
R. 2001. What CDA is about – A Summary of its history, important concepts and
its developments. In R. Wodak. and M. Meyer, M. (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London, Sage, 1-13.
33. Woodhead,
L. (2013). ‘Gender Differences in Religious Practice and Significance’. International
Advances in Engineering and Technology, 13, 58-85.
34. Yule,
G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Download the file by clicking here:
No comments:
Post a Comment
ENGLISH: You are warmly invited to share your comments or ask questions regarding this post or related topics of interest. Your feedback serves as evidence of your appreciation for our hard work and ongoing efforts to sustain this extensive and informative blog. We value your input and engagement.
HAUSA: Kuna iya rubuto mana tsokaci ko tambayoyi a ƙasa. Tsokacinku game da abubuwan da muke ɗorawa shi zai tabbatar mana cewa mutane suna amfana da wannan ƙoƙari da muke yi na tattaro muku ɗimbin ilimummuka a wannan kafar intanet.