This paper examined and highlights some of the important issues related to child development in Hausa culture and compares them with Ericson’s theory of development.
Child-Rearing in Hausa Culture: A Flash into Erickson’s Psychosocial Theory of Development
By
Rabiu Aliyu Rambo
Department of Nigerian Languages
Uamanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto
Abstract
Child-rearing or development is
fundamental in every society and any society that cannot inculcate the spirits of child-rearing from
this generation to another generation will not be a
good and developed society. It is through child-rearing that children are prepared for their adulthood
activities and responsibilities in
their respective societies. Erick Erickson developed a general psychosocial
theory that includes the interplay between psychological and cultural forces
working in child development. Given this, Erickson’s concepts had a basis of validity
in analyzing some Hausa socio-cultural life in respect to child-rearing, while
on the other hand, his concept has no validity. It is because of this, that this
paper proposes that despite the Erickson theory of development, Hausa people
have their developmental schema which goes hand in hand with that of Erickson.
In fact, the concept of the developmental stage is more than a Western
construct indiscriminately applied to indigenous culture. The Hausa culture has
its views of development that is perceived as a progressive series of stages.
In each stage of life, there is an element of “tarbiya” that will
enable them to produce who will carry on the family honor and tradition. In Hausa, the concept of “tarbiya”
encapsulates the highest of Hausa virtues. Therefore, this paper examined and highlights some of the important issues related
to child development in Hausa culture and compares them with Ericson’s theory
of development.
Introduction
Hausa
people are found in many parts of the
world, particularly in the various part of West Africa. The Hausa tribe is a
diverse but culturally homogeneous people based primarily in the Sahel and
Sudan areas of Northern Nigeria and Southern Niger, with significant numbers
also living in parts of Cameroon, Cote
d’Ivoire, Chad, Togo, Ghana, and Sudan. The greatest populations of the Hausas
are found in Northern Nigeria, in an area commonly known as the Hausa Land,
followed by the ones residing in the adjoining Southern Niger.
Nigeria
being the giant of Africa has many ethnic groups among which Hausa, Igbo, and
Yoruba constitute the majority.
Different patterns of child-rearing are practiced among these groups
from one society to another. Each ethnic group trains its children based on
their different cultural settings. Erickson developed a general psychosocial
theory encompassing the interplay between psychological and cultural forces
working in child development. Erickson’s concept had a basis of validity in
discussing some Hausa socio-cultural life in child development while others do
not. http://academia.edu/33987021. It is through this child-rearing that children
are prepared for their adulthood activities in their respective societies.
Looking at the current situation in Nigeria, divergence in political, economic,
and social problems has its bases from the early stage of a child’s life which
directly or indirectly emanated from child upbringing in our societies. Because
of this, the paper examines the Erickson theory on psychosocial development and
the Hausa cultural pattern of child development in Northern Nigeria.
The
concept of culture refers to the total way of life of a given people. Adelakun,
(1990), Bunza, (2006). Thus it includes any piece or pattern of behavior,
attitude, norms, values, objects, skills, belief system, and world out-look that
human beings learn and adapt as members of a given human group or society.
Taylor, (1958) perceived culture as a complex whole that includes morals, art,
law, knowledge, belief, customs, and habits acquired by a person as a member of
society. From the concept of culture, we can understand that the behaviors of
human beings are influenced by the culture of every society and varied from one
society to another.
Ecological
theories are of the view that the interaction of cultural forces in one’s
environment impacts individual development and overall well-being.
(Bronfenbrenner, 1979).
On the
other hand, Child-rearing practice is viewed as a pattern of raising children
that is specific to a particular society, subculture, family, or period in
cultural history. Child-rearing practices vary in such areas as methods of
discipline, expression of affection, and degree of permissiveness. APA (2020).
There
are three methods of parenting child-rearing which include:
1.
Authoritarian (a parent’s know-best
approach that emphasizes obedience).
2.
Permissive (which provides few behavioral guidelines
because parents don’t want to upset their children).
3.
Authoritative (which blends a caring tone
with structure and consistency).
Among
these three methods, authoritative parents have been found to have the most
effective parenting style in all sorts of ways: academic, social, emotional,
and behavioral. Like authoritarian parents, authoritative parents expect a lot
from their children, but also they expect even more from their behavior. https://www.greatshools.org.
The
authoritative parents engage with their child but they also set a limit, and
also enforce consequences when the child misbehaves. Those children raised by
these parents are likely to be happy and self-motivated and confident. https://howoadult.com.
Parenting
practices and the quality of the home environment, therefore, have great
significance in the development of children’s lives. Children should
be surrounded by mentally and physically healthy adult family members who are
constant, reliable and can provide them with love, support, and encouragement.
(Khadijah Rohoni, 2005)
Smilth,
(1953) has this to say about a newborn baby.
You
came into the world a polymorphous perverse little ape with billions of
biological evolution precipitated, so to speak in your dimpled organism. You came
naked, without shame, without language, food habits or manual dexterity, ideas
or religious faith, without respect for law and order, without any discernible
admiration… You came with no higher desires than to
have your capacious belly filled with milk and your somatic and viscera itches
scratched by loving hands….
Hausa Culture and Child-rearing in
Erickson Theory of psychosocial
A very
good and well-behaved child provides the Hausa with an important element for
their social mask. “It is an essential element to their economic activities
which benefit from the ability to move among and identify with a vast number of
potential customers. “Tarbiya” (person with a good character) woven into the individuals’ social
mask does not have one ideal manifestation but rather presents itself in a
range of acceptable forms. Ultimately, the purpose is to smooth the way for a friction-free,
open-door relationship”. Adeyanju, (2010:129).
From
the studies of Erickson's theory on stages of development, when compared with
that of Hausa culture stages of
development, we realize that, in some areas, the theory does not march exactly
with the Hausa culture of child-rearing, at the same time it does not
contradict them either. In Hausa culture, a well-behaved person is considered a
selfless gesture throughout the life experience. This includes the moral
concept that can be explored through good behavior, and not just by emotional
concept. In Hausa, this is very clear as Kohlberg and Mayer, (1972:450) term “a
cognitive-development theory” as a “rational and viable educational ideology”. https://www.academia.edu/33987021.
For
instance, the integral and important value in Hausa adult relationship, family
members have the responsibility to internalize “tarbiya” (well-behaved person), and in Hausa, this “tarbiya” is viewed
as a general responsibility of the community.
Here, when the community was able to induce this “tarbiya” to the
younger ones, it reduces the stress associated with the social interaction,
thus diminishing the possibility of conflict. For instance, in Hausa,
marketing activities are based on the personal ability to develop social ties
and to maintain those ties as you move through the wider society. This is a
social commodity culturally constructed which enables the Hausa to fulfill
their responsibilities as prime entrepreneurs throughout Nigeria and the rest
of West Africa. (Adamu, 1979).
In
Hausa society, in any developmental stage or concept, a well-behaved person is
measured on how each person contributes to the totality of understanding the
societal norms and values. The motive for the upbringing of a well-behaved
person in Hausa society is to promote harmony in life logically from the belief
that the good of all people is interconnected. In Hausa a proverb says “Barewa ba ta gudu ]anta
ya yi rarrafe” or “Doka daga gida take tashi” (Charity begins
at home). These proverbs remind Hausa people to always serve as a model of
behavior to younger ones because younger ones are directly copying from the
elders in the society.
Looking
at the social context which is usually satisfied through the display of
generosity particularly using Hymes, (1962) variation between competence and
performance, a “tarbiya” (a
well-behaved person) is viewed as a component of personality, honesty that can
be assumed through over actions at the right time. This can be observed in
Hausa culture using generosity as a measurement.
In
Hausa culture, they would seem to have the edge over the poor Hausa’s in performance
of tarbiya. (Barkow,1974). In Hausa
culture, they consider any poor man who
intentionally gives out his wealth to beggars in a good cheer to have fulfilled
the obligation of tarbiya with no
less respect than they view a wealthy man who gives from his greater wealth. In
Hausa society, the child with cheerful carriage who usually assists his younger
ones displayed “tarbiya”
no less than the adult patron who aids his client. This is to say at this
juncture that, at any level irrespective of age, in a social hierarchy, the
Hausa culture allows opportunities for the smut running of sincere “tarbiya”
in their societies. As such anything done in the society is being geared by the
“tarbiya”
of people in Hausa society. As such everyone in his life,
must take care of everyone else, which will eventually lead to taking care of
the entire community, this is the same as to says in Hausa culture child-rearing
if any person meets his or her obligations per the societal norms and value in
the society, the adult person is preparing to have competence and performance
or express his “tarbiya”,
and he will be exposed to wider society were sanction will be rewarded.
Smith
(1959) characterized Hausa culture as one of the patron-client relationships.
Factors including birth order, family prestige, and individual personality
assist the Hausa in determining the patron-client nature of all relationships
in their highly stratified society. Socialization practices, active throughout
life, assist the Hausa in determining whether she/ he should view the self as
the patron in a particular relationship. The patron-client nature of Hausa
culture is maintained in part by the practice of “tallafi” (assisting).
Child
adoption is usually done to extend the social ties of the Hausa child. It is
done usually at the age of 2-3 years when he undergoes weaning. Thus, the child
who rarely resides far from his parent is provided with communal support and
nurture while learning about the extent and boundaries of his or her social world.
4.0 Erikson’s and Hausa Culture stage of
development compared
ERICKSON Shekaru HAUSA
|
Stage
of Development |
Age Range |
Matsayin Girman Yaro |
1 |
Trust vs Mistrust |
Infancy
(0-2) |
Jarinta |
2 |
Autonomy vs Shame |
Toddlerhood
(2-4) |
Yaranta |
3 |
Initiative
vs Guilt |
Early Childhood (4-6) |
Ƙuriciya |
4 |
Competence
vs Inferiority |
School
Age (6-12) |
Samartaka |
5 |
Identity
vs Role Confusion |
Adolescence
(12-20) |
Samartaka |
6 |
Intimacy
vs Isolation |
Young
Adulthood (20-40) |
Angonci |
7 |
Generativity
vs Stagnation |
Middle
Adulthood (40-60) |
Manyanci |
8 |
Intergrity
vs Despair |
Old
Age (60+) |
Tsufantaka |
From
the table above, Erickson maintains that the personality of an individual
develops in a form of predetermined order, and is building up each on the
previous stage that is an epigenetic principle.
1. Trust
vs Mistrust: The theory observed that at this stage the infant
develops a sense of trust when interactions and it provide reliability, care,
and affection. Lack of this will lead to mistrust. (McLeod 2018).
In
Hausa Culture, there is the belief that it is nature and the will of God that
brings the child to the world, but it is the responsibility of society to create
the child into a social being, that is to give the child protection, feeding,
and education among others, and to expose him to the wider society. At this
stage, love and affection are shown to the child, which may eventually lead to the
trust of an infant in their parent. However, if the infants cannot get this
love from their parents, certainly they will develop a mistrust of their environment.
Maybe that is why Hausa culture child-rearing emphasizes breastfeeding for two
years to enable the infant to have close contact with their parent. At this
stage of jarinta, the Hausa employ
the use of “tawai” to their infant to
express love and affection
2. Autonomy
vs Shame and Doubt: This
is between 18th month -2-3 years. At this stage, the infant develops
a sense of personal control over physical skills and a sense of independence.
Erickson maintained that parents must allow their children to explore the
limits of their abilities within an encouraging environment that is tolerant of
failure. At this point, success leads to the feeling of autonomy, failure leads
to a feeling of shame and doubt (McLeod,
2018).
In Hausa culture child development, this stage is what they
refer to as yaranta, here they concord
with Erickson's theory at this stage, because will and training of the child are central in the development process. In Hausa culture,
parents explored their children some basic skills in their environment. For instance, in Hausa
culture, it is from this stage that parent incorporates their
child with small skill acquisition of their craft. Just like in
Erickson's theory, autonomy and shame play a vital role in the free development
of a child at this level.
3. Initiative
vs Guilt:
At this stage from 3-5 years, is when the children begin to assert control and
power over their environment by planning a lot of activities and accomplishing
tasks and are ready to face challenges. At this stage, success gave way to the
sense of purpose, and if dismissed through critics or control, the children
will develop a sense of guilt in society (McLeod 2018).
In Hausa culture, this is the stage of ƙuruciya,
and it is equally the playing stage as Erickson pointed
out. This is
when the child will begin to interact with his peer group, playing games like “wasa da ‘yartsana” and playing under the moonlight. It is at this
point that
the Hausa child starts to intermingle with his peer groups
which may lead to exposure to the wider society.
In this playing ground, success and failure of the child are observed by the
peer group, if a child failed any activity he will feel shame, but if he succeeds
in any activity, it will lead him to autonomy.
4. Industry
vs Inferiority: This is the
age between 5-12 years. At this stage, children’s peer group plays a vital role
in child-rearing, and it will become the major source of child esteem. At this
level, children are coping with the new learning and social demand. Success at
this stage leads to a sense of competence, while failure results in a feeling
of inferiority. (McLeod 2018).
In Hausa child development, this stage is very crucial because peer group has much influence
on the development of the child, that is why at this stage,
Hausa parents pay much attention to the movement of their children particularly observing their friends. In a
Hausa traditional setting, this is also the period of samartaka where children are trained in craft and industries and other norms and values of the community. This can be
found in Hausa society wherein a
communal traditional family, guardians or parents of a child who performs well in
accordance to the norms of the people will be rewarded as successful, and those
who misbehave are shamed, and they will be advised to rectify things in order of the culture.
5. Identity
vs Role Confusion: This is the age between 12-18 years. At
this stage, teenagers explore who they are in their community, seek to
establish a sense of self, and may experiment with different roles, activities,
and behaviors. This is very vital to the process of forming a strong identity
and developing a sense of direction in life (McLeod 2018).
At this
stage of samartaka, Hausa
parents are regarded as an agent of socialization to their children. They try
to enforce rules at home and make the children to understand the rules. At this
point, children are expected to abide in conformity with the rules. They are
also punished appropriately if they violated the rules. In Hausa culture child
development, at this stage also parents train their children necessary home
training which includes religious and moral values like honesty, truthfulness,
respect for elders, and self-discipline.
6. Intimacy
vs Isolation. This is the age between 19-40 years. These are the
major conflict centers of performing intimate, loving relationships with
others. Success leads to strong relationships, while failure leads to loneliness
and isolation. (McLeod 2018).
In
Hausa culture, this stage is what they refer to as anganci/amarci. As
the child grows into adulthood, parents emphasize on him the need to adjust to
new socio-psychological conditions through proper guidance and counseling.
Inappropriate counseling could lead to the total destruction of a child’s life
that could not be corrected again. It is because
of this, that the Hausa community at this stage
encourages their youth to be friendly with others in the community. This is the
stage where community work is encouraged like “aikin gayya” and the host of others.
7. Generative
vs Stagnation: This is the age between 40-65 years. At this point,
people experience a need to create or nurture things that will outlast them
often having mentees or creating positive changes that will benefit other
people. Success leads to the feeling of usefulness and accomplishment, while failure
results in shallow involvement in the world. This theory does not march exactly
with the Hausa culture child-rearing, at the same time it did not contradict it
either.
8. Ego
Integrity vs Despair: This is the age between 65-death. This
stage involves reflecting on one’s life and either moving into feeling
satisfied and happy with one’s life or feeling a deep sense of regret. Success
leads to the feeling of wisdom, while failure results in regret, bitterness,
and despair. https://www.simplypsychology.org/saul-mcleod.html
At this
stage when we compare Erickson's theory with that of the Hausa stages of development,
we can conclude by saying that it is almost the same. Because in Hausa, it is
during this stage of tsufantaka that we contemplate our accomplishments
which could lead to our integrity as successful in life. On the other hand, if
we view our life as unproductive, we do not accomplish our objective in life,
we will develop despair which will lead to depression and hopelessness in
society.
Conclusion
From
the studies above, one can assess that, well-articulated child-rearing
practices are a panacea to rapid and efficient development activities of any
modern and civilized society because development itself is all about people in
any society. The concept of tarbiya
encapsulates the highest of Hausa virtues. The paper contends that, despite Erickson’s Theory of
development, Hausa people have their schema on development which they perceive as a progressive series of stages which include jarinta, yarinta, kuriciya, samartaka, angonci, manyaci and
tsufantaka. In Hausa society, each stage of
development is aimed at guiding the child toward the perfection and progress of
his value as an adult. Efficient child-rearing will leads to conformity to
societal norms and values which will give way to a well-organized, morally
upright, orderly, and well-integrated society. At this juncture, therefore,
parents are advised to create ample time to be with their children so much so
that they can give them training and nurture required of them to equip the
children for future roles they are expected to play in the overall development
of the society (Olesegun, 2013:249).
References
Adamu, M. (1979). The Hausa Factor in West
African History. Zaria: Ahamadu Bello University Press
Adelakun, A.O. (1990). “The concept of
culture” in Ikenga Metuh, E. and Ojoade, O. (Eds), Nigerian Cultural Heritage.
Plateau: Imico Publishing Company.
Adeyanju, E. and Salamone, F. A. (2010).
Ewa and Kirki: Yoruba and Hausa Child RearingChild-rearing Compared. New York:
New York City Housing Authority.
APA. (2020) American Psychological
Association. Washington : 750First st. Nt. Washington, DC 20002-4242.
Barkow,
D. (1974). Evaluation of
Character and Social Control Among the Hausa. Benedict, Ruth
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of
Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bunza, A. M. (2006). Gadon Feɗe Al’ada. Lagos: Tiwal Nigerian Ltd.
Hymes, D (1962). Ethnography of speaking.
In Anthropology and Human Behavior. T.Gladwin and W.C. Sturtevant, (eds).
Washington: Anthropological Society of Washington.
James, M. H. (1972). Child-Rearing
Practice in Northern Nigeria. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press.
Khadijah
Rahoni, M.Y. (2005). Child-rearing
Practice in Rural Poor Malay Society: Nurturing an Identity Through Islamic
Values. In H.O. Asmah and Maris, P. (Eds.)
Religion and Identity. Tanjung Malim: UPSI University Press.
Kohlberg and Mayer. (1972). Adolescent as
a philosopher:The Discovery of self in a postconventional World. Daedalus:
100:10511066
McLeod, S. A. (2018). Erickson ‘s stage of
psychosocial development. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/Erik-Erikson.html
Olesegun,
A.J. (2013). Socialization and Child RearingChild-rearing Practice Among
Nigerian Ethnic Groups. Academic Journal
of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Mcser-Cemas-Sapienza: University of
Rome.
Tylor, E. B. (1958). Primitive Culture,
Vol 1. 1. New York: Harper and Row Torch
Book.
Sites
https://www.academia.edu/33987021.html
https://www.academia.edu/33987021.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
ENGLISH: You are warmly invited to share your comments or ask questions regarding this post or related topics of interest. Your feedback serves as evidence of your appreciation for our hard work and ongoing efforts to sustain this extensive and informative blog. We value your input and engagement.
HAUSA: Kuna iya rubuto mana tsokaci ko tambayoyi a ƙasa. Tsokacinku game da abubuwan da muke ɗorawa shi zai tabbatar mana cewa mutane suna amfana da wannan ƙoƙari da muke yi na tattaro muku ɗimbin ilimummuka a wannan kafar intanet.